Liberals use the following arguments to explain away the Biblical passages that implicate them:-
"Why anyone should have troubled to crucify the Christ of Liberal Protestantism has always been a mystery." – William Temple, Archbishop of Canterbury
"A bland Jesus who simply told people to look at the lilies of the field—such a Jesus would threaten no one, just as the university professors who create him threaten no one." – Roman Catholic scholar John Meier
“I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept his claim to be God. That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic — on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg — or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God, or else a madman or something worse. You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon or you can fall at his feet and call him Lord and God, but let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about his being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to.” – C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity
Implications of liberal teaching:-
Liberal Christianity is untenable because:-
Liberals are guilty of stealing words. Liberal Christianity is not liberal because it denies God's liberal (generous) gift of salvation and has nothing of value to offer to non-Christians. It is not Christian because it contradicts the original definition of Christianity. It is not "progressive" either because it sends people to hell, not heaven.
Further Reading: Machen, J. Gresham. 1937. Christianity and Liberalism. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Co.